requestId:68753bf101add4.34354347.
Yangming and Contemporary Confucianism Research
——A conversation about “Wang Yangming Physics Research
Author: Li Honghua Wu Xiaofan
Source: Peng Pai News
Date: December 19, 2021
[Author Introduction]
Li Honghua, a researcher at the Institute of Philosophy, Hebei Academy of Social Sciences, Director. Huadong Master is a bachelor of law and a master, a doctor of Chinese philosophy, and an interviewer at the Taiwan Advanced Research Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences. Book publishers specialize in “Confidants and Righteousness” – A preliminary study on the moral foundation of Confucian morality” (Shanghai Sanlian Bookstore, 2014), “Humanistic Sensibility and Political Order – An Analysis of the Thoughts of Twenty Century Civilization and Old-Political Ideology, 2016” (Shanghai Ancient Books Bookstore) “Research on Wang Yangming’s Physics of Body and Mind” (Shanghai Sanlian, 580,000 words, September 2021), etc.; there are also “Scholars and Rights-An Analysis of the Duality Structure of the Political System of the Chinese Traditional Society of Scholars and Rights” (Shanghai National Library Society), and “Yangming Xinxue” and “Telling the History of Chinese Philosophy” and other works will be published. He has published more than 40 academic papers in Chinese and foreign academic journals and collections such as Literature and History Philosophy, Humanities Philosophy, Philosophy, Philosophy, Philosophy, Philosophy and Civilization, Huadong Teachers’ and Physical Journal, Philosophy Analysis, Philosophy Journal, International Confucianism, Hebei Journal, Hangzhou Teachers’ and Journal of Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of the Journal of
Wu Xiaofan is currently an associate professor at the Shanghai Institute of Financial Humanities. Huadong Master Fan Da’s PhD in Philosophy, taught by Gao Ruiquan. The important research areas are compared with Chinese philosophy and Chinese and Western philosophy. He wrote “The Rise of Modern Self-Philosophical Symbols of Self-Remembering and Thinking”. He has published more than ten articles in academic journals such as DaoBaobao Stories: A Journal of Comparative Phnosophy (american), “Huadong Teachers’ Model Major (Philosophy Edition)”, “Thoughts and Civilization”, etc., including the Qianlong and Jiaqing Ethics, Ming and Qing dynasties, and Modern Chinese Philosophy. There are also several translations. It is in charge of 3 projects including the National Social Science Fund Youth Project; it participates in many major projects of the National Social Sciences and the Educational Department Base.
Editor’s note: The new book “Wang Yangming Physics Research on Physics of Body and Mind” by the Hebei Academy of Social Sciences, “Research on Physics of Body and Mind” was released in Shanghai Sanlian Bookstore in September 2021.According to the author’s preface, the book was his doctoral paper. It took nearly eighteen years from the topic to the final official release of the book. The content of the book also changed a lot. At the same time, the book not only discussed related topics about Ming, but also had a wide range of fields such as Chinese and Western philosophical comparisons. Deputy Professor Wu Xiaofan from the Shanghai Department of Financial Philosophy was the same as the researcher Li Honghua, but each discussed the focus of the study. After reading, he had a written conversation with Li Honghua on the focus and related issues. The conversation will be published to treat readers.
“Wang Yangming Physical and Mind Philosophy Research-Life-Restoration Based on the Overall Body and Mind”, written by Li Hongwei, Shanghai Sanlian Bookstore, September 2021 edition
Wu Xiaofan: Your Chinese Philosophy Research has always focused on the mind and nature大官网大官网大官网大官网大官网. Your doctoral essay is about “On Wang Yangming’s Body and Mind View” (completed in 2007), and later “Confidant and Righteousness” (Shanghai Sanlian Bookstore, 2014) and “Humanistic Sensation and Political Order” (Shanghai Ancient Books Bookstore, 2016), both of which are closely related to the study of mind and nature. You seem to have a chance to open up the “outer king” of “inner sage”, and this approach is the most questionable aspect of the learning of mind and nature at the moment. What do you think?
Li Honghui:It is very challenging to open the article with this question. Although this problem does not come directly from this book, it is indeed not unrelated to the content of this book. If you read it in combination with the following two books, you will not be able to cause related ideas or even doubts.
In the past, we have a saying that “the old sage cannot open the new outer king” (this view was very popular in the eighty to the middle and late nineties of the previous century). This contains serious doubts about the modern neo-Confucianism (especially or importantly the school of mind and nature) “returning to a new saying”, and I personally have a sympathetic understanding of this kind of concern. If we talk about this problem, we personally have two explanations:
First, from the focus of our personal thinking, I regard the Confucian inner sage as the essence and focus of Confucianism. This inner sage is the personal physical and mental learning, and this is also the basic direction for me to study Wang Yangming’s physical and mental philosophy. IIt is believed that the Kung Fu and Realm Discussions and Realm Discussions from Confucius and Mencius to Confucianism in Song and Ming dynasties, especially the mind-study theory (of course, based on their physical and mental evidence) is the focus of the Confucianism’s pursuit of Tao or personal living and living, and is a place where we can still absorb nutrients tomorrow to hide and realize wisdom. What is worth mentioning here can also be a place for extremely rich disputes. From the beginning of the Confucian Confucianism in the Song Dynasty, especially to Wang Yangming, the study of body and mind opened the gate where the three religions of Confucianism and Taoism were connected. This was exactly the place where the regular Confucianism and even the disciples of the tomorrow were ill, including the so-called “the last word of Wang Xue”, etc. Of course, Yangming is still Confucianism rather than other schools.
I believe that the focus of Confucianism in mind and nature is its kung fu discussion and state discussion. It actually has the characteristics of openness, individuality and life-oriented nature. From the perspective of individual life-consumption, it can also face the question of Oriental Thoughts and open up to individual cultivation methods in different religions. Judging from the development trends of the contemporary world, modern value civilization has become a value choice for human cooperation. Secondly, in terms of individual choice of peace and wellness, life connotation paths based on the landscape of different civilizations can be put into competition and choice along the way. The path of learning the mind and nature actually has its broad nature to communicate. It has a special gene of communication in the divergence. This is my understanding of the learning of inner sages or physical and mental in Confucian TC:
發佈留言